20 Soalan bocor untuk #Everything2Hide


Interesting discourse…
#SuaraMerdeka – Everything to tell, nothing else but the truth..
Dari Lim Sian See kepada Tun Mahathir Mohamad..

1. If Malaysia did not go bankrupt when Mahathir more than doubled our Debt-to-GDP within the first 5 years of him taking over as the PM from 44% in 1980 to 103.4% in 1986, then how is Malaysia going to bankrupt when our current debt ratio is only 52.7%?

2. There are 80 countries in the world with higher debt ratio than Malaysia’s 52.7% including most of Europe, the USA, Singapore, Japan etc.. If Malaysia goes bankrupt, would the 79 other countries with higher ratios go bankrupt first?

3. Mukhriz admitted in court recently that you (Mahathir) and Muhyiddin had planned to remove Najib as early as 2014 before the 1MDB issue was blew up. Does this mean that Muhyiddin and Mukhrz were removed for being in a conspiracy to topple the UMNO president instead of questioning about 1MDB? 

4. Is it true that you and your 4 children are listed by the SSM as having interest and ownership in 488 registered companies? If it is not true, how many hundred companies do your family have? How much are these companies worth?

5. Tun has fought for the Malays and Islam for 22 years and finally you succeeded to have 3 Malay-Muslims in the top 10 richest persons in Malaysia in 2014 with your son Mokhzani being the 2nd richest Malay- Muslim capitalist. Do you consider this is your proudest achievement?

6. Is it true that a few months before you retired, the Minister of Finance under you had directly awarded a 20 years monopoly sports gambling license to Vincent Tan without tender and without informing cabinet and for a bargain rate of RM20mil only – which Vincent then sold it a few years later at a RM700mil valuation with huge profits?

After that, the tycoon had spent millions of Ringgit to throw birthday parties for you each year to celebrate your birthday. Is this considered corruption? If it is no what is it Sir!?

7. Mirzan had bought Diperdana Bhd, which was Malaysia’s third-largest container trucking business from Danny Tan (Vincent Tan’s brother) while Mokzani had bought Pantai Hospital from Vincent Tan. How many other companies were bought and sold between your sons and Vincent Tan and his family? Pls just the truth, just the truth..

8. PPBM’s AMT A Kadir Jasin had said that when you were in power, the tycoons keep on lending you their private jets for you to use. Did you use those jets and is this considered corruption as you had received benefits in kind? Or was Kadir lying? Of course he was not.. hemm.

9. Is it true that Tun is among the top 3 largest shareholder in the 5 star Palace of the Golden Horses hotel near your house?

10. When did you buy your current banglo in Country Heights for and how much did you pay? Do you still have evidence of your payment? 

11. In 1988, a  compulsory land acquisition order and eviction order was served on the Turf Club for the land which KLCC now stands on. Why was this order then cancelled and why didn’t the goverment carry out the acquisition at nominal value but instead allow Ananda Krishnan to take over the land the next year and subsequently made billions by selling it to Petronas a few years later?

12. You had said that Kit Siang and DAP were racist but now you said they are not racist? Were you lying then or are you lying now?

13.  You had said that Anwar Ibrahim is morally unfit to be the PM but now you say he should be the new PM. Were you lying then or are you lying now?

14. In 2003, a few months before you retired and a few months before Mukhriz listed his Opcom company, the Ministry of Finance of which you were the minister, had written to the government-controlled Telekom Malaysia to enter into direct negotiations to award a RM214mil project to Opcom, which is majority owned by Mukhriz. Are you prefer your very own-crony-capitalism instead?

Is this abuse of power and clear conflict of interest? Pls answer!

14. You had said that Najib’s economic policies are wrong and that he should revert back to your policies. But Pakatan had said that your past policies were wrong as it led to low salaries, cronyism and high income inequality.

If you win in PRU14, does it mean that Pakatan supports you in implementing your old policies that will lead us to to low salaries, cronyism and high income inequality again? Are you promoting something in reverse with blantant u turn!?

15. If you had loved Proton so much and was confident in its success, why didn’t your sons pay the RM1billion to buy Proton instead of letting Geely buy? Your sons have experience in the auto sector and certainly have the money so why didn’t you ask them to buy? 

16. During your 22 years as the Prime Minister, the USD went from RM2.40 to RM4.87 until you pegged it at RM3.80, which is still a 60% drop. 

But when Najib took over, the USD was RM3.73 and now it is RM4.28 – a 12% drop.
So who do you consider to have failed? You or Najib?

17. When you were PM, in 1985 our main export commodity prices crashed by half and this led us to the recession. But in 2015, our main export commodity prices (which is Petroleum now) crashed by half but it didn’t lead us to recession and Malaysia continued to grow. Do you think this is an achievement of Najib?

18. Malaysia’s government debt only jumped high in 2009 as Najib needed to pump RM60b into the economy which was to stabilzie and protect us from the effects of the Great Global Recession in 2007 to 2010. Since then, Najib has been cutting the deficit every year.

As you are blaming Najib for increasing the govt debt now, do you also blame him for stabilizing and protecting our economy from the effects of the Great Global Recession – the worst since the 1930s?

19. When you lost RM30 bil Forex deal in 1991, it was 22.2% of our GDP of RM135 bilion.

Today, 1MDB’s remaining debt is about RM27 bilion – which is 2.2% of our GDP of RM1,230 bilion (RM1.23 Trillion) last year in 2016.

*So, if we did not go bankrupt then due to the Forex Scandal, how are we supposed to go bankrupt now due to 1MDB?*

20. Did you learn from Lim Guan Eng to use the courts to delay the RCI on the BNM Forex Scandal – the same way as Guan Eng is using the courts to delay his corruption trials, which has not started hearings for more than a year now.

BONUS QUESTION: You have been quoted to say you actually own 40 or 50 horses. How much do you pay every month to keep and feed those horses? 

You recently let go off your cook and maid because you said the government stopped paying them. Is the amount that you are paying monthly to keep the 40 or 50 horses less than the salaries of your cook and maid? Or are the horses more important than your loyal cook and maid?

If you did not learn from Guan Eng then who did you learn from?

LSS.

PS. Can someone ask Mahathir and Pakatan the above questions in his next #everthing2hide forums or Jelajah Siapa Bercakap Benar ceramah?

And pls just remember to wear helmet when you ask any of these questions, sebab takut kerusi, selipar, kasut juga piring terbang melayang-layang!

Advertisements

Penyamun semakin meningkat 


Kini kedai dobi segera self service menjadi sasaran perompak penyamun. 
Maka wajarlah pihak pemilik tidak lagi membuat sistem terbuka.  Pintu keselamatan perlu dibuat untuk keselamatan pelanggan.  

Sebelum pelanggan masuk perlu ada pemeriksaan keselamatan.  Pelbagai kaedah boleh difikirkan oleh pihak berkuasa dan pemilik. Jika tidak diambil perhatian perniagaan dobi ini akan bungkus kerana pelanggan akan lari.  

Dahulu pernah di tularkan penyamun datang ke ke kedai dobi dan melarikan tv lcd tanpa ada rasa takut dan bersalah .

Penderma Clare Rewcastle sebenarnya yang memberikan wang kepada Hadi


❎ Kegagalan itu secara tidak langsung telah menyangkal dakwaannya bahawa Perdana Menteri Dato ‘Seri Najib Tun Razak telah meminta bantuan politik dari Hadi dengan memberi suapan sebanyak RM90 juta.
❎ Keputusan mahkamah adalah berikutan kegagalan berulang kali Clare Rewcastle Brown untuk memfailkan Penyataan Pembelaannya sehingga 30 Ogos 2017, iaitu tarikh akhir yang ditetapkan Mahkamah London melalui Perintah Mahkamah bertarikh 2 Ogos 2017

❎ Pada ketika itu, Clare Rewcastle Brown, yang rasa tidak puas hati dengan bantahan tersebut, terus memberitahu hakim bahawa Badan  Kehakiman Malaysia dan juga Perdana Menterinya adalah “korup dan bersekutu dengan Hadi

❎ Hakim memberitahunya dengan jelas bahawa Mahkamah tidak boleh secara membabi buta melabelkan sebuah negara berdaulat (dan badan kehakiman) sebagai korup tanpa bukti yang kukuh

❎ Adakah anda mempunyai idea siapakah yang mengeluarkan wang tersebut bagi membantu Clare Rewcastle Brown memperkayakan peguam Hadi?

❎ Mungkin anda adalah penyokong Pakatun tipikal (menyokong Pakatan Harapan secara membabi buta) yang sentiasa bersedia untuk bergaduh setiap kali Mahathir Mohamad perlukan anda. Ya, orang yang telah salahkan PAS kerana memecah Pakatan Rakyat dan menganggap Hadi yang mengagalkan Kajang Move Rafizi.

Clare Rewcastle’s donors actually giving Hadi money – The Third Force 

September 2, 2017
“Pakatuns akan terus memperkayakan Hadi dan peguamnya, kerana Clare Rewcastle Brown akan cuba untuk  melengah-lengahkan perbicaraan srhimgga selepas pilihan raya umum ke-14 (PRU14) kerana untuk menghalang rakyat Malaysia daripada mengetahui apa yang saya telah katakan selama ini bahawa semua bukti yang dia dikatakan dimilikinya hanyalah fabrikasi sahaja yang tambah dengan persepsi dan khabar angin, tidak ada satu pun yang mempunyai bukti, tidak ada yang boleh diguna di Mahkamah Undang-Undang’.

THE THIRD FORCE

By: Raggie Jessy

(Translated by: Ariff Ahmad)
Anda semua telah kena tipu dengan Clare Rewcastle Brown.

Hari Khamis lepas, wartawan British yang tidak bermaruah itu telah gagal mendapatkan masa lanjutan dari Mahkamah London dalam kes saman fitnah yang difailkan terhadapnya oleh presiden PAS, Dato ‘Seri Abdul Hadi Awang. Kegagalan itu secara tidak langsung telah menyangkal dakwaannya bahawa Perdana Menteri Dato ‘Seri Najib Tun Razak telah meminta bantuan politik dari Hadi dengan memberi suapan sebanyak RM90 juta.

Keputusan mahkamah adalah berikutan kegagalan berulang kali Clare Rewcastle Brown untuk memfailkan Penyataan Pembelaannya sehingga 30 Ogos 2017, iaitu tarikh akhir yang ditetapkan Mahkamah London melalui Perintah Mahkamah bertarikh 2 Ogos 2017 (lihat gambar di bawah). Ironinya, ini adalah wanita yang sama yang menghabiskan hampir dua tahun memberitahu rakyat Malaysia bahawa dia mempunyai banyak bukti kukuh (smoking gun evidences) untuk membuktikan bahawa Perdana Menteri Malaysia adalah seorang yang mengamalkan rasuah dan seorang yang jahat.

Tetapi kenapa dia masih gagal menyerahkan buktinya pada tarikh yang telah ditetapkan.

Pukulan pertamanya adalah semasa pendengaran Pengurusan Kes (Case Management hearing) pada 6 Ogos 2017. Pada hari itu, ketua editor Sarawak Report telah meminta hakim menetapkan £800,000 (kira-kira RM4.5 juta) sebagai cagaran keselamatan (security deposit) yang Hadi perlu depositkan di Mahkamah. Dalam pembelaannya, dia memberitahu mahkamah bahawa Hadi, sebagai seorang rakyat Malaysia, oleh itu Hadi mungkin akan gagal untuk membayarnya sekiranya Clare Rewcastle Brown memenangi kes tersebut.

Tetapi Peguam Hadi telah membantah dengan hujahan bahawa Clare Rewcastle Brown mempunyai kebebasan untuk saman Hadi di Malaysia. Peguam-peguam Hadi terus menegaskan bahawa pelanggan mereka secara sukarela telah menawarkan security deposit dengan Mahkamah sebanyak RM80,000, satu jumlah yang mereka menegaskan adalah “mencukupi dan tidak kontroversi (sufficient and uncontroversial).” Pada ketika itu, Clare Rewcastle Brown, yang rasa tidak puas hati dengan bantahan tersebut, terus memberitahu hakim bahawa Badan  Kehakiman Malaysia dan juga Perdana Menterinya adalah “korup dan bersekutu dengan Hadi.”

Bayangkan betapa bodohnya  wanita ini?

Dia bukan sahaja menutup peluangnya untuk menebus maruahnya, tetapi dia sebaliknya mungkin telah menyebabkan hakim marah kepadanya, yang memberitahunya dengan jelas bahawa Mahkamah tidak boleh secara membabi buta melabelkan sebuah negara berdaulat (dan badan kehakiman) sebagai korup tanpa bukti yang kukuh. 
Hakim kemudian menetapkan jumlah £14,350 (kira-kira RM78,000) yang Hadi perlu membayar kepada Mahkamah serta juga memutuskan bahawa Clare Rewcastle Brown perlu membayar kos kira-kira 15,000 pound (kira-kira RM85,000).

Dan itu hanyalah sebahagian kecil daripada £700,000 juta (kira-kira RM3.8 juta) kos undang-undang dijangkakan perlu ditanggung oleh Hadi. Masih ada rakyat Malaysia yang tertanya-tanya bagaimana ketua editor Sarawak Report berjaya membayar kos sebanyak 15,000 pound kepada Mahkamah? Adakah anda mempunyai idea siapakah yang mengeluarkan wang tersebut bagi membantu Clare Rewcastle Brown memperkayakan peguam Hadi?

Mungkin anda tahu jawapannya.

Mungkin anda adalah penyokong Pakatun tipikal (menyokong Pakatan Harapan secara membabi buta) yang sentiasa bersedia untuk bergaduh setiap kali Mahathir Mohamad perlukan anda. Ya, orang yang telah salahkan PAS kerana memecah Pakatan Rakyat dan menganggap Hadi yang mengagalkan Kajang Move Rafizi.

Ya kamulah orangnya!

Pada 25hb Julai 2015, Clare Rewcastle Brown dengan lantang mengumumkan bahawa Sarawak Report telah dapat kumpul lebih kurang £30,000 (kira-kira RM160,000) untuk ‘mempertahankan’ dirinya terhadap saman Hadi. Itulah 15,000 pound dalam bentuk deposit yang telah didepositkan di Mahkamah London, dan sebanyak £10,000 – hingga £15,000 untuk bayaran kepada peguam Hadi sekiranya Presiden PAS memenangi saman tersebut.

Dan kita juga tidak bercakap mengenai kerugian wang pembayar cukai sebanyak £30,000 yang terpaksa dibayar oleh Clare Rewcastle Brown kerana suka menggunakann taktik menangguh yang  dalam usahanya untuk mengikis wang deposit sebanyaj £800,000 dari Hadi. Secara keseluruhannya, ketua editor Sarawak Report hanya mempunyai Pakatun untik berterima kasih kerana membantu memperkayakan pengacara Hadi dengan taktik memperdayakan Mahkamah London untuk menangguhkan kes Hadi.

Menakjubkan?

Lebih menarik lagi ialah hakikat bahawa Pakatuns akan terus memperkaya Hadi dan peguamnya, kerana Clare Rewcastle Brown berhasrat untuk melambatkan perbicaraan sehingga selepas Pilihan Raya Umum ke-14 (PRU14) kerana untuk menghalang rakyat Malaysia daripada mengetahui apa yang saya telah katakan selama ini bahawa semua bukti yang dia dikatakan dimilikinya hanyalah fabrikasi sahaja yang tambah dengan persepsi dan khabar angin, tidak ada satu pun yang mempunyai bukti, tidak ada yang boleh diguna di Mahkamah Undang-Undang.

Sekarang adakah anda dapat melihat bagaimana wanita ini memerah wang dari penyokongnya sendiri untuk tujuan yang tidak berasas?

https://www.thethirdforce.net/clare-rewcastles-donors-actually-giving-hadi-money/?_e_pi_=7%2CPAGE_ID10%2C7039915853